Comments on: And They Probably Looked Like Wilma http://ancarett.com/?p=505 Thu, 09 Sep 2010 00:52:16 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.2 Comment on And They Probably Looked Like Wilma by: Notorious Ph.D. http://ancarett.com/?p=505#comment-16821 Thu, 15 Nov 2007 18:17:53 +0000 http://ancarett.com/?p=505#comment-16821 Ow. That's just... ow. I'm with Belle on this one. Ow. That’s just… ow.

I’m with Belle on this one.

]]> Comment on And They Probably Looked Like Wilma by: Belle http://ancarett.com/?p=505#comment-16810 Thu, 15 Nov 2007 02:38:54 +0000 http://ancarett.com/?p=505#comment-16810 Now, now... you know the interviewer ignored all the non-sexist parts. Otherwise, the piece would never have been picked up by anybody. Let's get out our clubs (fashionably decorated, of course) and beat them all silly. Now, now… you know the interviewer ignored all the non-sexist parts. Otherwise, the piece would never have been picked up by anybody.

Let’s get out our clubs (fashionably decorated, of course) and beat them all silly.

]]> Comment on And They Probably Looked Like Wilma by: squadtratomagico http://ancarett.com/?p=505#comment-16805 Wed, 14 Nov 2007 15:11:46 +0000 http://ancarett.com/?p=505#comment-16805 Holy Shit! The part about the manly men loading the furnace while the girls in miniskirts look on? Urrggh! Holy Shit! The part about the manly men loading the furnace while the girls in miniskirts look on? Urrggh!

]]>